However, it has its uses, especially in the serendipity department, or wow, look at what I found.
So, I started out with a search on library management. Not so good. Tried that as a phrase. Hmm. Better. Looked through the blogs listed and found, sigh,
ANOTHER one to add to my bloglines blog roll on library stuff.
Browsing through that blog's posts (see link above if you've already forgotten my newest find) led me to the infamous
Annoyed Librarian. Ok - the AL, as those in the know call this blogger, generates an inordinate amount of comment, far more that this blogger is due. Some say they know who it is, some are incensed this person blogs anonymously and at LJ, too boot. Here's a fine example of an
AL post with 176+ comments. The comments are worth reading, too; lots of self-impotent peeps gassing away there, too. Yes, I posted there. Booby prize to you if you figure out which post is mine.
Some folks think the AL is funny - well, not ha-ha funny, but funny as in
tongue-in-cheek so. I'm not so sure. Sometimes I think the AL is out to cause discord in the ranks for no better reason than, "because I can." Francine Fialkoff quotes the AL as saying that the AL is no more "the writer" than Charlotte Bronte was Jane Eyre. Well, that don't warsh. Publishing one unified story, that comments on society and mores, is not the same as publishing a long string of posts in the blogosphere that masquerade as serious commentary and then asking us to believe it's all in good fun. Besides, all fiction entails autobiography.
As to whether the AL is fostering necessary discussion - well, I'd say the AL isn't adding anything new or original to the debate on "whither the library." Tina McElroy Ansa has a much better written and thought through, though old, argument about books and reading in the
November 30 Atlanta Journal-Constitution; it's worth reading this essay, pondering it, and discussing the issue.
So, there you have it. My technorati odyssey. I'll be back for more.